Saturday, 5 May 2012

Short selling ban by ESMA and its effect


On 20 April, 2012 European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published the last of its advice on the technical aspects of the Short Selling Regulation. The regulation, which defines the restriction on the short selling of shares, sovereign debt and Credit Default Swaps (CDS), applies from 1 November 2012 and is applicable both inside and outside of the EU. It overrides the EU national laws on the subject, including, for example, the German ban on naked sovereign CDS; however, national competent authorities retain the power to suspend the ban. The European Commission is expected to approve over the next three months. The European Parliament and the Council have the right to object to these decisions within three months. This process should not affect the 1 November date when the law becomes applicable.

The Regulation aims to improve the transparency of short selling by setting up a regime of notifications of significant net short positions in sovereign debt, shares and sovereign CDS. The calculation of what constitutes a net short must include sovereign debt, sovereign CDS, derivative positions and other sovereign debt correlated (70% or more) to the sovereign debt in question. The threshold above which a notification becomes necessary is defined as a percentage of the outstanding amount issued by the sovereign: 0.1% when the outstanding amount is €500bn or less and 0.5% otherwise.

Key highlights of regulation:

Ø  Only naked short CDS transactions executed prior to 25 March 2012 will be grandfathered and ay be held to maturity. Naked short CDS transactions executed following that date may need to be covered or closed out prior to 1 November 2012. There are no grandfathering provisions for uncovered short positions in sovereign bonds or shares.

Ø  Naked short positions in sovereign CDS are only allowed for market making and hedging purposes. With few exceptions, the sovereign issuer used as the hedge must match the geography of the asset/liability that requires hedging.

Trading sovereign debt and CDS: What is allowed?

From a trading perspective, the Regulation defines a new set of restrictions on net short positions in sovereign debt, sovereign CDS and shares. Essentially, uncovered shorts are banned, although exemptions apply. The main intent of the Regulation is to restrict short selling to market making and primary market operations and for hedging purposes, as follows:

Market making – The Regulation exempts market makers and primary dealers from the restrictions applicable to the short selling of sovereign bonds and CDS.
.
Hedging – The Regulation allows short selling for hedging purposes with limitations as to which hedges
can be used. The naked short in sovereign CDS is permitted if it aims to hedge (i) the risk of default of a sovereign entity or (ii) the decline in value of an asset/liability, which is correlated to such sovereign. Furthermore, investors need to demonstrate (i) the correlation between the sovereign CDS hedge and the asset/ liability to be hedged and (ii) the proportionality of the hedge.

To be admitted as a hedge, the sovereign CDS must generally match the geographical location of the assets or liabilities the investor wishes to hedge. For example, French corporate risk with French sovereign CDS and no other CDS, subject to the few exceptions.

Exception to this rule is (i) when the relevant sovereign CDS is very illiquid; or (ii) when the corporate, or the risk that needs to be hedged, has strong links to a different sovereign (in terms of revenue, cash flow, or investment).

Correlation – Hedger will have to demonstrate the presence of a ‘meaningful correlation’, over a specified   time horizon, weighted to the most recent data (i.e. lastday’s weight is 1/250, second last is 2/250, etc). However, no minimum level of correlation is set. ESMA recognizes that there are several other ways to demonstrate correlation, ultimately allowing for considerable flexibility to ensure that sovereign CDS can be used to hedge a wide range of assets and liabilities.

Proportionality – The hedger also needs to ensure that the duration of the CDS is aligned as closely as possible to that of the risk

Effect of the regulation:

Relative value play –Proposed regulation in it’s current form diminishes the scope of sovereign CDS as macro hedges or relative value trades.

Short selling of bonds – The short selling of bonds, on the other hand, appears less stringent. First of all, an investor is deemed to be net short sovereign debt if after the addition of all sovereign debt (including sovereign debt from another member state that has a 70%+ correlation on the yields), sovereign CDS and related derivatives, the total position is net short. In this case, however, the regulation does not restrict a short sale provided that an arrangement with a third party is in place to ensure access to the bonds if and when needed.

Market implications – The main impact of the shorting restrictions for Fixed Income will arise, in our view, through reduced use of sovereign CDS. At present, there are four main user groups of the product:

1)      Dealers Market-makers take both long and short positions to provide liquidity to other market participants.

2)      Bank CVA, correlation and loan desks CVA desks use sovereign CDS to manage bank counterparty risk. Typically they are buyers of protection. Correlation desks use sovereign CDS to hedge the mark-to-market risk of derivatives which reference sovereign entities. Loan desks typically buy protection to hedge correlated, underlying loan exposures.

3)      Hedge funds take both long and short positions in sovereign CDS in order to exploit relative value opportunities across markets or to express directional views on a particular sovereign or basket of sovereigns (e.g. SovX).

4)      Asset managers may use sovereign CDS to sell protection to take a synthetic,long risk position as an alternative to buying specific securities, to buy protection to hedge underlying exposures and occasionally, to take long or short positions as part of a relative value strategy.

As we can see, various exemptions to the shorting ban will likely permit most forms of market making and hedging activity, while relative value use will suffer the most. However, meeting the hedging criteria for SovX will be difficult given the cross-border make-up of the index. Therefore, it is likely that liquidity in the SovX index may be the biggest victim of the shorting ban. Likely beneficiary of loss of SovX liquidity will be the use of single-name sovereign CDS as a valid, alternative hedge.

Please see the full technical details put up by ESMA

http://www.esma.europa.eu/system/files/2012-esma-263_-_final_report_on_technical_advice_on_short_selling.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment