Thursday 26 April 2012

Mechanism of Cross currency basis swap (EURUSD)


USD against Euro for a long time has been range bound even though data in USA on average has surprised on upside, and corporate profit beating expectation left right and center and Europe kicking the cane every time it come across a possible disaster except a few moment of eureka like LTRO. Second thing is EURUSD cross currency basis swap (XCCY), Which generally widen when you see companies from eurozone finding it difficult to fund in USD. Recently the forex swap line extended by Fed to ECB and other central banks had brought a kind of sanity to XCCY market, though that proved temporary. EURUSD XCCY 5 Year again back to 40bps. So there is a disconnect between and credit and currency market. iTraxx/CDX is trading at a bit north  of 1.4 from a level 0.8 in 2010. Let us analyse some technical factors underneath, iTraxx main and CDX main is composed of 125 most liquid investment grade names and every six months they roll over and new names enter the index at the expense of few discarded ones. US saw a few name move out due to credit event and Europe which generally does not allow big company to default (they are national champions!!!) so banks keep feeding money even though their credit metrix deteriorates (one reason US credit market is dominated by bondholders 80/20 and Europe credit market by bank loan, 20% bank loans and 80% bonds where bankers have personal relation with top executive and keep rolling loans making it less valuable when the company default). So bottom line is churn out ratio of index constituents is higher in CDX than iTRaxx, second most important thing is financial. They constitute 20% of total index (25 financial names in iTraxx main) and US financials are off course in a much better shape than European, given the high correlation between banks and sovereigns. So one tend to wonder why Euro is not weakening more, given the uncertainty and crisis has reached to door of its 2nd,3rd, 4th and 5th largest economy namely France (political), Italy and Spain (debt and growth)  Netherland (political). One reason may be USD itself faces a lot of pressure in risk on scenario with a very accommodative monetary policy and Fed bloating its balance sheet by USD 2.3 trillion after financial crisis, 2nd is political deadlock in an election year. We have seen the hara-kiri last year over debt ceiling negotiation and we may see it again when Bush tax cut expire. Let us try to understand it from the XCCY perspective.

Let us analyse the mechanism of cross currency funding, keeping in mind that the issuer need to fund Euro assets.

Suppose issuer is funding euro-denominated assets, and can issue either USD or EUR bonds at L+100bps in each respective market. This issuer decides to issue in USD. Why? The answer has much to do with the FX basis, which makes USD funding look cheaper once the cost of swapping back to EUR is considered.

Step 1: The issuer elects to issue into the USD bond market, paying USD Libor+100bps on $100 MM of bonds (1). At the same time, the issuer enters a simultaneous hedging transaction with the swap dealer.

Step 2: The issuer pays the dealer the $100 MM raised in the bond market for €75 MM (i.e., today’s spot exchange rate) (2). An agreement is also made to reverse the transaction, at the exact same exchange rate at the bond’s maturity, which will deliver $100 MM back to the issuer to cover the bond’s principal at maturity.

Step 3: During the term of the swap, the issuer receives USD Libor on the $100 MM ‘lent’ to the dealer and pays Euribor plus or minus an amount ‘X’ on the €75 MM ‘borrowed’ from the Dealer. This spread (‘X’), the cross-currency basis. At present, the five-year EUR/USD basis is quoted at -40bp, meaning that the issuer will pay the dealer €Euribor- 40bp in exchange for a stream of $Libor+0bp payments.

Computing the cost: Taken all together, the issuer:
*Pays $Libor+100bps to the bond market
*Receives $Libor+0bp from the dealer
*Pays the dealer Euribor -40bps

The $Libor flows cancel out, and the issuer is left paying Euribor-40bp +100bps, equivalent to paying approximately Euribor+60bp. Thus, provided the issuer’s funding cost in EUR is greater than L+60bp, issuing in USD at L+100bp may be appealing.

(Cross currency basis swap spreads against USD Libor as of 25 April, 2012 for 5 years)

Driver of the FX basis.
Now the question is what drives FX basis ? ‘Supply & demand’ simple explanation.

If the swap market is being asked to lend more in EUR (in exchange for USD), the higher the rate on EUR it will charge. Thus, as more European companies issued in USD and made the corresponding swap, one would expect the rate on the €Euribor leg to rise from €Euribor-40bps to, say, €Euribor-20bps, reflecting marginally higher EUR borrowing costs. In doing so, the EUR/USD FX basis would rise from -40bps, to -20bps. Conversely, if the market were filled with companies issuing in Euros, and then looking to swap this into dollars, Euros would become plentiful and dollars more scarce. In turn, swap dealers would offer to pay a lower and lower rate on the Euros they were receiving in exchange for USD, causing the EUR/USD basis to be more and more negative.

Since in the time of stress access to USD funding for Eurozone corporate / banks become difficult so the demand to swap USD in Euro also falls, leading rates to fall. Thats what we have seen recently, however we have not seen the corresponding level of depreciation in EURUSD.

Does it indicate we may see Euro depreciating after US in near future, probably YES given the bigger problem Eurozone face. Its only a matter of time.




Wednesday 25 April 2012

Bloomberg shortcuts

Anyone who uses bloomberg will find it handy.

Mnemonic   Function Description
ALLQ          Bid & Offer Quotes 
ASW             Asset Swap Calculator
AZS   Altman's Z-score Model
BBEA Earnings Analysis 
BBTE  Bloomberg Bond Trader Europe
BBTG  U.S. Treasury Actives
BBXL Bloomberg Data & Calculations in Excel 
BC7 Corporate Bond Price/Yield Calculator
BLP  Bloomberg Launchpad 
BLRV Bond List Relative Value
BQ  Bloomberg Quote
BR   Bloomberg Research
BRDY  Brady Bonds 
BU   Bloomberg University
CBQ  Country Quotes 
CBRT  Central Bank Monetary Policy Rates 
CCRV Commodity Price Curves
CDSW  Credit Default Swap 
CEM Contract Exchange Menu
CMDX Global Commodity Prices and Data
CN  Company News 
CRB Commodity Futures Price Index
CRPR  Credit rating
CRR Commodities Futures Ranked Returns
CRY ThomReuters/Jeffries CRB
CSDR  Sovereign Debt Ratings 
CSHF   Bond Payment Schedule
DDIS   Debt Distribution
DES  Description 
EBIS World Bond Markets Ranked Returns
ECO Calendar of Releases
ECST   World Economic Statistics
FA   Financial Analysis
FWCV  Forward Curve by Currency 
FXC  Key Cross Currency Rates 
GCSD Global Commodities Supply and Demand
GGR  Generic Government Rates for Bonds & Bills
GP  Graph 
GRAB   E-mail a Screen
HG4  Hedge Vs Currents Ratios 
HP                Historic Price
HS  Historic Spread
IBQ  Bloomberg Industry Analysis
IECO  Economic Stats (Global Comparison)
IRSB  Interest Rate Swap Rates
IYC  International Yield Curves
LEIN Leading Economic Indicators
LR  LIBOR Rates
MEMB  Index Members
MGU  Message Defaults
MMR  Money Rate Monitors by Country
MRR Constituent Ranked Returns
MYS  Yield Spread History (Mortgage)
NIM  New Isseu Monitor
NLRT  News Alert
PFC  Cashflow Analyser
RELS  Related Securities
RMEN Global Real Estate Indices
RV Constituents Relative Value
SGIP  Spread Graph
SGY  Yield Spread Graph
SRCH  Bond Search
USSW US  (can substitute country) Interest Rate Swaps Monitor
WB  World Bond Markets
WBF World Bond Futures
WBIS World Bond Indices
WCAP World Market Capitalization
WCR  World Currency Rates
WCRS  Currencies
WCV  World Currency Value
WECO  World Economic Calendar
WEI  World Equity Indices
WEIS Equity Indices Ranked by Returns
XCCY Cross Currency basis swaps spreads against USD
XLTP Excel tmplete library
YA  Yield Analysis
YAS Yield and Spread Analysis
YASD  Yield Analysis Defaults
YCRV   Yield Curves Analysis 

Saturday 14 April 2012

European Stability Mechanism, how big is big enough ?

It looks like expecting wisdom from European leaders is not a sign of wisdom in itself. The European Council adopted a comprehensive package of measures to respond to the ongoing crisis, as well as to guard against such crises materializing in the future. Stated goal of the policy measures are to strengthen preventive and corrective mechanisms to address internal and external imbalances, in particular fiscal imbalances and competitiveness problems of individual Member States, well before they might pose systemic threats. In addition, the package includes the establishment of a permanent crisis management mechanism as an ultima ratio safeguard against imbalances in individual countries. It is foreseen that the new European Stability Mechanism (ESM) will enter into force on 1 July 2013, following an amendment to the treaty on the functioning of the European Union (the Treaty) and the signing of an ESM Treaty by the euro area countries.

The euro zone says the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) and ESM together can lend a further €700 billion (roughly $916 billion). But this full amount isn't available immediately. The EFSF has €248 billion remaining, which is available until June 2013, when the EFSF is due to close to new business. The ESM becomes active only in July 2012. The ESM will have a total subscribed capital of €700 billion, of which €80 billion will be paid-in capital and €620 billion callable capital. This capital structure has been put in place to ensure the highest possible credit rating AAA for the ESM, while also guaranteeing a lending capacity of €500 billion, the same as the combined lending capacity of the EFSM (60) and EFSF (440). Overall the effective lending capacity will not be more than €500 billion at any point of time as per latest scheme of things. It looks like a classic example of kicking the cane down the road, every time EU is in a desperate situation. After all market wants to see the money immediately available rather than waiting for 2013 and not half of the required amount. RBS pegs potential requirements for Italy and Spain, as well as any further aid for Greece, Ireland and Portugal at €1.1 -€1.2 trillion over the next three years.

I also do not understand the logic of charging an interest rate (200 to 300 bps) above the cost of funding of ESM. To be frank I will be surprised if ESM even with its AAA rating will be able to manage to keep its cost of fund below bund plus 100 bps which effectively means lending at 5 to 6%. Assuming there is no disruption in the market as these instruments in itself are untested and appetite of the market is unknown. Given the flaws in the fire wall, it might be the European Central Bank once again forced to play the role of unwilling firefighter.

“Lord, grant me chastity and continence but not yet” St. Augustine. It seems like European leaders are not taking any cue from the famous prayer. Spain, Greece and all these trouble nations are forced the austerity diet down their throat which is chocking their growth and worsening all the measures like debt to GDP. To make matters worse, these measures are affecting the political and policy environment given the Elections in France and Greece. Greece where the recession is turning into a depression – may vote to parties that favor immediate default and exit from the eurozone. Irish voters may reject the fiscal compact in a referendum. And there are signs of austerity and reform fatigue both in Spain and Italy, where demonstrations, strikes, and popular resentment against painful austerity are mounting. Simply speaking Spain with one fourth of the total population unemployed can’t afford the austerity, every logic and reason defies it. Though, if of any comfort to Spain things are equally worse in Greece and Portugal also.

The IMF's new analysis of 99 housing busts across 25 advanced economies over the past three decades found that housing crises preceded by large surges in household debt tend to be more severe, with an economic slump persisting at least five years. The pattern has played out around the world. At the end of a housing boom, indebted households cut spending, pushing down overall economic demand, employment and incomes. "That sets off a negative chain reaction with more defaults, banks being more worried about lending, and there can be long-term damage to the economy,".


Spain, which is well into that cycle, faces severe economic turmoil. In 2007, the end of a decade long boom in home construction pushed Spanish employment and spending down. The resulting budget woes are fanning fears the country will need a bailout, worsening the European debt crisis. Home prices in Spain have dropped more than 20% since 2007, but many analysts believe they need to drop at least 20% more. Spanish banks are still sitting on a pile of troubled loans.

Unemployment Rate and Changes

Rate

Level

Unemployment rate

Feb-12 Jan-12 Dec-11

Austria

4.2

4.1

4.2

Belgium

7.2

7.2

7.1

Germany

5.7

5.7

5.7

Finland

7.4

7.5

7.5

France

10.0

10.0

9.9

Italy

9.3

9.1

8.9

Luxembourg

5.2

5.1

5.1

Spain

23.6

23.3

23.0

Ireland

14.7

14.7

14.7

Portugal

15.0

14.8

14.6

Netherlands

4.9

5.0

4.9

USA

8.3

8.3

8.5

Japan

4.5

4.6

4.5

Lagging: 2-Mos

Dec-11


Nov-11

Oct-11

UK

8.3

8.3

8.4

Greece

21

20.6

19.7

Source: Eurostat


Spanish industrial production declined 6.8% in February 2012 from a year earlier, because of lower activity in the construction and car-manufacturing sectors, statistics agency Instituto Nacional de Estadística, or INE, said. Spain's industrial output hasn't posted growth in a year the latest sign that the euro zone's fourth-largest economy remains mired in contraction, as Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy expressed renewed support for deep spending cuts.

Composite PMI output (March)

Ireland 52.4 11-month high (Expanding)

Germany 51.6 3-month low (Expanding)

France 48.7 5-month low (contracting)

Spain 46.0 2-month high (contracting)

Italy 45.6 2-month high (contracting)

Source: Markit

Policy fear as well as inevitable recession in the periphery is driving the Interest-rate spreads for Italy and Spain up again, while borrowing costs for Portugal and Greece remained high all along. Credit-default swaps on Spain rose to 498 bps, surpassing the previous all-time high closing price of 493, bps, signaling deterioration in investor perceptions of credit quality. The rate on Spain’s 10-year note touched 5.99 percent, at which Greece and Ireland turned to EU and IMF for bailout. Sovereign insurance costs also rose elsewhere, with the Markit iTraxx SovX Western Europe Index of default swaps on 15 governments climbing 4 bps to 278.5.

Meanwhile, the credit crunch in the eurozone periphery is intensifying: thanks to the ECB long-term cheap loans, banks there don’t have a liquidity problem now, but they do have a massive capital shortage. Faced with the difficulty of meeting their 9% capital-ratio requirement, they are trying to achieve the target by selling assets and contracting credit – not exactly an ideal scenario for economic recovery, along with some innovative but dangerous procedure called “balance sheet optimization”, which is assigning the lower risk weightage to assets on the balance sheet (Banks are allowed under Advanced Internal rating based approach). Added to this, are reports that Spanish banks raised their holding of government debt to €68bn under the LTRO, thus closely linking the health of the banking sector to the fate of the government’s debt. “Moody’s has highlighted that Spain will not be able to keep up with its redemptions and that is something that will keep Spanish banks locked out of the market for a prolonged period of time,”. Banco Popular’s five-year Cedulas is now trading at mid-swaps plus more than 280bps, having priced at plus 255bps in March, and the last senior deal, a five-year from Santander, is some 88bps wider than its mid-swaps plus 265bps level.

Overall, just austerity will make the crisis worse. What peripheral countries need is front loaded growth measures and postpone the austerity for medium to long term. I agree there are some moral since profligate member might forget learning from the crisis but that risk Germany has to take if it wants Euro zone to continue. Current situation in EU remind us what once woody Allen said, “One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness and the other to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly”. Amen.

Below you find two link with some interesting data on Eurozone.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304692804577281351909552874.html?mod=WSJ_earnings_RightSecondHighlights

http://graphics.thomsonreuters.com/12/04/ES_GFX0412_SB.html

Thursday 12 April 2012

Apple stock, Is it overvalued ?

Apple has two product to boast of iPhones and iPads. But the market capitalization of Apple inc is about $580 billion (4.63% of total S&P 500 Market cap) -- exceeding market cap of the entire sector of Utilities, Telecom, and Materials-- about $426, $348 and $ 434 billion respectively. Needless to say Apple has outperformed the market (S&P 500 YtD up 8.6%) and all of its competitors given YtD and 1year return of 54% ($218) and 86% ($288). is it conceivable that speculation rather than fundamentals may be driving the stock performance? given the insane forecast by analysts that Apple might be the 1st stock with a $1 trillion market Cap by the year end 2012. Lets assume S&P 500 touches 1500 by 2012 end (optimistic forecast) then also Apple to be a trillion dollar stock will take its weightage in the S&P 500 index to 7.37% from already high of 4.63%. Personally i would prefer not to put so many eggs in one basket.

Next risk enamates from legal battle Apple is facing legal battle, right from Samsung, Motorola and HTC to a Chinese company and Department of Justice US Government. Problem with Apple is unlike its competitors (samsung website lists more than 130 phone models) it has only two core product (both of them insanely high margin) iPhone & iPad. If it falters even once it will fall from the high pedestal.

S&P 500 as of EoD 12th April, 2012 (Largest is indicative of Appl)
Number of Constituents500
Adjusted Market Cap ($ Billion)12,542.13
Constituent Mkt. Cap(Adjusted $ Billion)
- Average25.08
- Largest580.46
- Smallest1.15
- Median11.62
% Weight Largest Constituent4.63%
Top 10 Holdings(% Market Cap Share)20.50%
Source: Standardandpoors.com

However, give the credit where its due, Apple has consistently blew away consensus forecast, but ironically that makes it more susceptible to sell off, if it disappoint even once.

So are we nearing to a correction ? i think yes but unlike past fallen angels it will not be brutal.