- Bloomberg
- Businessweek
- CNBC
- FT
- WSJ
- Financial Express
- Economic Times
- The New York Times
- Economist
- Econmonitor
- Economist Intelligence Unit
- BoE
- ECB
- FRB
- St Louis Fed
- RBI
- OECD
- world Bank
- E library IMF
- Euro Stat
- Haver Analytics
- Creditex
- Macro Trends
- ISDA
- ISDA Market
- Markit
- Fitch
- Moody's
- S&P
- NBER
- Project Syndicate
- Sober Look
- Voxeu
Wednesday, 29 August 2012
Friday, 24 August 2012
Monday, 6 August 2012
Is Indian equity market poised to enter into bull phase?
Is Indian equity
market poised to enter into bull phase? The question appears every time we see
a brief rally. However, I think in most
optimistic scenario this is too early to expect a bull rally from here. Even
though I believe that certain names has the potential to see a rally.
Industrial growth remains weak--- and growth
expectation revised downward
The seasonally
adjusted purchasing managers' index (PMI) for the manufacturing sector dropped
to 52.9 in July from 55 in June. New orders grew at the weakest pace since
November 2011, with new export orders falling for the first time since October
2011 hurt by the lingering global economic slowdown. Same report indicated that orders
decelerated faster than inventory accumulation, suggesting that the slowness in
output expansion will continue in the months ahead. In another sign of
cooling economy, India's merchandise
exports fell 5.45% to $25.07 billion in June from a year earlier, while imports
slid 13.46% to $35.37 billion, according to provisional data issued by the
Ministry of Commerce. Now the short term potential growth target for Indian economy is 5.5% to 6%.
Inflation remains an issue specially after below normal monsoon
June inflation, at 7.3%, was below market
consensus (7.6%). Primary articles inflation continues to be high at 10.5%, but
there is little RBI can really do about it. The case for a RBI rate cut has
surely strengthened with core inflation persisting at 5.0%. However, Poor rains can push inflation to 10%.
A study by Bank of America shows a 5% swing in agflation impacts inflation by
175bp. This will likely push up inflation to around 10% levels. Even though RBI
can not combat a weather shock, poor rains may increase call of the RBI holding
rate still in 2H12 to ward off any criticism about being 'soft' if poor rains
fan inflation to 10%, especially if diesel prices are hiked as well. It is for
this reason I expect that the window for the RBI to support growth will narrow
in coming months.
Rates high; relief only by 3rd Qtr
RBI raised
its official policy rate by 375 basis points between March 2010 and October
2011 in order to restrain inflation, cut the rate by half a percentage point in
April, to 8%. However, Inflation remains uncomfortably high, which will limit
the scope for further reductions.
High lending rates are hurting loan demands, as
per RBI report Indian banks' non-food credit growth slowed to 16.5 percent in
May, compared with 21.9 percent in the year ago period. The deceleration in non-food credit was led by commercial
real estate, where growth was only 2.8 percent, sharply down from 19.9 percent
in the year ago.
The growth in credit to industry, services,
non-banking financial institutions, as well as personal loans, also declined in
May. The sharp decline in loan growth is accompanied by the fastest rise in bad
loans of Indian banks and incremental growth in their restructured loans, at
least in the past four years.
The only
sector that showed an increase was agriculture, where credit growth was 14.6
percent, compared with 12.8 percent a year ago, the data showed. “The demand for credit has slowed down in
line with the slowing economy, the demand for credit will revive only when the
investment environment turns conducive,” Which I am expecting only 4th qtr
(January –March) onward, limiting the equity market rally.
In my opinion the below
normal monsoon in India is the biggest challenge, as this not only restrain the
monetary response but also increase the chances of social upheaval. When I say
social upheaval it does not mean a coup but political response under which no
party gets a mandate which can bring the structural change and policy measure
necessary for growth.
“Them belly full but
we hungry ...
… A hungry man is a
angry man ...
… A hungry mob is a
angry mob.”
—Bob Marley,
Friday, 3 August 2012
US unemployment: Headline better than expected
WSJ interactive graph, US unemployment since 1948 (A comprehensive graph, give it some time to populate)
The U.S. economy added more jobs
in July than in any month since February, but the unemployment rate ticked up
to 8.3%, signaling that the U.S. recovery, while not headed for a stall,
remains too weak to bring down high unemployment. Employers added 163,000
jobs in July, far above the 64,000 they added in June. In total non government
non farm job creation was 172,000 better than expected
(government sheded 9000).
But the household survey showed some
weakness and a slightly smaller than expected rise in avg hourly earnings
points to a sluggish advance in July personal income. In fact, the
aggregate weekly payrolls gauge -- which combines the impact of changes in
employment, hours and hourly earnings -- rose only 0.2% in July. This follows
on the heels of a solid 0.7% rise in June.
Most importantly, some of the
upside in July payrolls appeared to be attributable to special factors. For
example, a sizeable portion of the 25,000 rise in the manufacturing sector
seems to be related to seasonal adjustment issues. Also, a 29,000 rise in the
restaurant category is probably reflective of seasonal noise.
So why did the stock market sky
rocketed today ? one easy explanation, animal spirit. A market which was lately
devoid of any good news, first ECB then Fed disappointed market by building
expectation and delivering far below the expectations. So the market as usual
wanted just something to cheer itself up. As we say market can be irrational
for some time but it correct itself in the long run.
So given that actually this job number is
kind of report which force Fed to sit on the side line, not good enough to pull the
economy on itself and not bad enough to force Fed to announce QEIII. In my view the equity
and commodity including gold is loser tough credit can be the beneficiary as we
know a moderately growing economy can benefit credit. However there is still
one more unemployment report before Fed meet. So my expectation is Fed will
watch it before taking action and if the data disappoint, which is more likely
than not then Fed will announce another round of QEIII in September.
Wednesday, 1 August 2012
Europe fearing a lost decade.
“We should not come away from the crisis
thinking that expanding access to finance is bad. In general, expanding access
is beneficial (just not before a crisis!), but finance is a powerful tool that
has to be used sensibly. Access is good; excess is bad” Raghuram Rajan
For my benefit I interpret “Access to
finance” to narrowly defined term “Access to credit”, equities account for 55%
of capital resources in both the U.S. and Europe, but European banks are much
more important to the economy, accounting for about 70% of financial resources
allocation (versus about 20% for U.S. banks). The key difference is that the
U.S. has a deep, liquid and vibrant corporate bond market, which has also
allowed companies to bypass the banking system to obtain financing at times of
severe banking crises and credit crunches. This is a key reason why the U.S.
economy has sprung back much more quickly from the 2008 Great Recession than
either Europe or Japan, where economic activity is held hostage by banking
retrenchment.
One fear is going forward, the credit
crunch in Europe will get worse before it gets better. European banks
are not as well capitalized, but much more leveraged than their U.S.
counterparts, and the credit crunch in the euro area has barely begun.
According to a Mckinsey study “Basel III could significantly change the
composition of banks’ Tier 1 capital; risk weights, especially in trading
books; and capital ratios. New McKinsey research estimates that the effect of
these new rules on Europe’s banks would be a capital shortfall of about €700
billion" this mean either they raise capital of €700 billion or
reduce assets by €7 trillion or a mix of both. What’s more, Basel
III’s proposed new standards for liquidity and funding management would
constrain funding severely. Mckinsey estimates that European banks may be
required to hold an additional €2 trillion in highly liquid assets (LCR) and to
raise €3.5 trillion to €5.5 trillion in additional long-term funds (NSFR). At
present, European banks have only about €10 trillion in long-term unsecured
debt outstanding.
So the risk that Europe goes though its
own version of a lost decade is not trivial.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)